Monthly Archive for June, 2006

Page 2 of 2

29 Marbles

Brett Miller has a blog entitled “29 Marbles” that has lots of posts I enjoyed reading this AM. For example, consider this snippet from Parents Thoughts on Cure and Prevention of Autism

By saying I would prevent autism at an early age if I could, I’m not saying that I don’t value my child as he is now. I can’t imagine these past 15 years without him, and it is safe to say that my career path, my wife’s career path, and my other son’s life would be completely different had we not lived in Autismland all this time. But at the same time, I have no doubt that life without autism would have been just as enjoyable and rewarding, yet filled with the more ‘typical’ challenges that parents of teenage boys experience.

There’s lots more to Mr. Miller’s post on this topic and thare are many others worth reading. Link to 29 Marbles and also see his Autism for Parents site.

Sphere: Related Content

Threats idle or not

Over on Liquid Waffle Girl, the blog about teaching upper-elementary school students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Jill has a post about difficult interactions between her students and those from another (general ed) class. She observed (and reported to the administration) a student from another classsroom threatening her students: The other student “announced; ‘you better watch out, I’m gonna come down there and shoot all ya’all in 401.’” In addition to describing how the understaffing in the school hampered her ability to respond, she explains that the school principal apparently ignored her report.

Sphere: Related Content

Family interventions

As a graduate student, I had the good fortune to work on family intervention projects that were then housed at Oregon Research Institute and are now part of the Oregon Social Learning Project. The foundational work on family intervention conducted there by G. Patterson and J. Reid probably is strongly represented in the studies reviewed in this report, the abstract for which I found on PUBMED. (I know this is not exactly news—the review is nearly a year old—to those who keep up with the research, but it may be of interest to other readers…O.K., maybe one of you folks.)

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;44(9):872-87.

Family-based treatment research: a 10-year update.

Diamond G, Josephson A.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and The Center for Family Intervention Science, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. gdiamond@psych.upenn.edu

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update on the state of the art of family-based treatment research. METHOD: Randomized clinical trials conducted in the past 10 years that included parents as a primary participant in treatment of child and adolescent psychiatric problems were reviewed. Studies were identified from major literature search engines (e.g., PsycINFO, Medline). Current significant pilot work was identified in the National Institute of Mental Health Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) Web page or from the authors themselves. RESULTS: Family treatments have proven effective with externalizing disorders, particularly conduct and substance abuse disorders, and in reducing the comorbid family and school behavior problems associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Several new studies suggest that family treatments or treatment augmented by family treatments are effective for depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: For many disorders, family treatments can be an effective stand-alone intervention or an augmentation to other treatments. Engaging parents in the treatment process and reducing the toxicity of a negative family environment can contribute to better treatment engagement, retention, compliance, effectiveness, and maintenance of gains. Recommendations for the next decade of research and some implications of family-based treatment for child and adolescent psychiatry are explored.

Link to the abstract at the JAACAP site.

Sphere: Related Content

Ethnicity and special ed

More than half of the New York City (NY, US) students identified as having emotional or behavioral disorders are of African-American descent, according to a story by WNYC’s Beth Fertig. Ms. Fertig discussed this matter with Charlene Hall, the mother of Trae who has been identified as needing special education services, and Beth Harry, a well-known special educator from the University of Miami (FL, US). Here’s a snippet of the report when Ms. Fertig interviewed a principal and a state education agency administrator (SEA) about the issue of disproportionality, special education, and high-stakes testing for graduation:

REPORTER [FERTIG]:Trae is bright and performs at grade level when he’s able to focus. The No Child Left Behind Law requires special education students to take annual tests – just like all other students – to hold schools accountable for their progress. Some kids are given extra time, and low performing kids are measured in other ways. Last year, Trae’s school – which is called P4 – met its goals for math. But it fell short in English, putting it in danger of state intervention. Principal Marci Berger says she is personally frustrated when success is overshadowed by failure.

BERGER: There’s so much that’s good that’s going on and there’s so much that we combat by the mere nature of the children with whom we work. I look at our kids, and to watch them struggle to pass a test to prove what? To me it’s more important that a child learn to function and the child can actually write a paragraph.

REPORTER: [SEA] Deputy Commissioner [Rebecca] Cort says the state is talking with federal officials about allowing more flexibility when assessing kids who function way below their grade level. She’s also taking a second look at graduation targets. New York State originally wanted an average of 80 percent of all special ed students to receive academic diplomas by 2011, but has scaled that goal back to 64 percent. In New York City, the goal is about 45 percent. Cort believes that’s still not too much to ask once schools really address the achievement gap.

CORT: When you actually point out to people and you examine very carefully this disproportionality people are shocked. And they don’t realize that it’s really going on in their school they don’t notice it. So just that first realization is a big part of it. And then you do have to look at what is driving this?

Link to Ms. Fertig’s story in HTML or download an MP3 of it.

Sphere: Related Content

Teacher’s blog

Jill, who maintains LiquidWaffleGirl, teaches pre-adolescents with EBD in New York City (NY, US). Last week she had a post about a good day, but this week she’s frustrated by the telephone conversations she’s having with parents.

Sphere: Related Content

Language matters

PubMed has a link to a study describing the importance of early language facility in children. It’s a small study, but it’s got some good features (it’s longitudinal, that is, it follows children as they grow), so it’s worth noting. Why is this important? Well, it shows that children who do not acquire the ability to operate on their environment—to use language to make things happen—have greater potential for some pretty substantial problems (autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder).

Neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental outcome of children at age 6 and 7 years who screened positive for language problems at 30 months.

Related Articles
Neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental outcome of children at age 6 and 7 years who screened positive for language problems at 30 months.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 May;48(5):361-6
Authors: Miniscalco C, Nygren G, Hagberg B, Kadesjö B, Gillberg C
We present a prospective study at school age of neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental outcome of language delay suspected at child health screening around 30 months of age. In a community sample, 25 children (21 males, 4 females) screening positive and 80 children (38 males, 42 females) screening negative for speech and language problems at age 30 months were examined in detail for language disorders at age 6 years. The screen-positive children were then followed for another year and underwent in-depth neuropsychiatric examination by assessors blind to the results of previous testing. Detailed follow-up results at age 7 years were available for 21 children. Thirteen of these 21 children (62%) had a major neuropsychiatric diagnosis (autism, atypical autism, Asperger’s syndrome, attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), or combinations of these. Two further children (10%) had borderline IQ with no other major diagnosis. We conclude that children in the general population who screen positive for speech and language problems before age 3 years appear to be at very high risk of autism spectrum disorders or ADHD, or both, at 7 years of age. Remaining language problems at age 6 years strongly predict the presence of neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorders at age 7 years.
PMID: 16608544 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PubMed: attention AND defici… 6/6/06 8:56 PM Miniscalco C, Nygren G, Hagberg B, Kadesjö B, Gillberg C Dev Med Child Neurol

Link to the PubMed reference.

Sphere: Related Content

Autistic expectations

Cammie McGovern, mother of an 10-year old with autism, wrote about parents’ actual or alleged contributions to the deaths of three individuals with autism as a springboard to make an important point about parents’ expectations for their children. Writing in the New York Times (NY, US), she argues that families need to be told that total recovery and normalcy are not appropriate expectations for children with autism.

Clearly there is a message in the recent deaths about the urgent need to increase support for the rising number of families struggling with autism. Having an autistic child is estimated to cost a family $10,000 to $50,000 a year in out-of-pocket expenses for medical treatment, therapy and education. With 50 new diagnoses of autism in this country every day, support services are already too stretched to meet the need.

But as much as I’d like to fault government policy, I suspect it is not entirely to blame. There’s another issue that hits closer to home and is harder for most parents of autistic children to be candid about. When your child is initially diagnosed, you read the early bibles of hope: “Let Me Hear Your Voice,” “Son-Rise” and other chronicles of total recovery from autism. Hope comes from a variety of treatments, but the message is the same: If you commit all your time, your money, your family’s life, recovery is possible. And who wouldn’t do almost anything ? mortgage a home, abandon a career or move to be closer to doctors or schools ? to enable an autistic child to lead a normal life?

Now, as the mother of a 10-year-old, I will say what no parents who have just discovered their child is autistic want to hear, but should, at least from one person: I’ve never met a recovered child outside the pages of those old books. Not that it doesn’t happen; I’m sure it does. But it’s extraordinarily rare and it doesn’t happen the way we once were led to believe.

Ms. McGovern’s column raises very important ideas. If not all, most of the students with whom we work will never completely shake the problems they have. Too often, we educators have unrealisitic expectations for our students. We can help them to lead more normal lives, but we are not going to cure anyone of all those problems. As adults, these individuals are still going to have mannerisms, quirks, gaps, and other irregularities in their behavioral and skill repretoirs.

It’s fine to have high expectations, but not unrealistic expectations. Too-high expectations have deleterious consequences. For example, too-high expectations can lead us to hope for miraculous improvements, increasing our willingness to adopt untested methods our our vulnerability to scam artists. We need a good dose of realistic thinking. Thanks, Ms. McGovern.

Link to Ms. McGovern’s editorial.

Sphere: Related Content

You’ve got to teach them

Late in May, U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne held the Henrico County (VA, US) local education agency (LEA) for “knowingly and repeatedly [failing] to provide a system of instruction suitable” for 8-year old Reid Tutwiler, who has autism. In his story about the case, Bill McKelway of the Richmond Times Dispatch reported that Judge Payne critized the LEA for not meeting standards of care.

Payne found that Henrico improperly offered Reid an educational program in which he would not make any more than minimal educational progress.

Payne ruled that evidence in the case showed Reid required a rigorous, intensive education program of between 20 and 30 hours of instruction per week. “The fifteen hours provided by the [county's plan] was insufficient,” she [sic] said.

The Tutwiler’s son began attending The Faison School in Richmond in December 2002 and immediately began showing huge strides in his ability to focus attention and speak. His vocabulary, almost nonexistent during his stay in Henrico schools, grew to 100 words.

Payne wrote that the system used by Henrico was not designed to, did not, and could not provide Reid with the intensive instruction he needed and eventually received at Faison.

The Faison School provides evidence-based instruction predicated on applied behavior analysis. Usually this is code for the discrete trials training procedures developed by Ivar Lovaas and colleagues.

Link to Mr. McKelway’s story. Link to the Faison School Web site. Although I’d heard about this victory 1 June from a person who’s involved in the Richmond autism scene, I hadn’t reviewed it until I found it on (tip of the virtual hat) Charles Fox’s Special Education Law Blog.

Sphere: Related Content

Wraparound projects

Here’s a good opportunity for improving services for students with EBD and their families.

*******************************************************************
Grants for the Integration of Schools and Mental Health Systems
(Federal Register: May 30, 2006 [CFDA# 84.215M])
*******************************************************************
Purpose of Program: Grants for the Integration of Schools and Mental Health Systems will provide funds to increase student access to high-quality mental health care by developing innovative approaches that link school systems with the local mental health system.
Applications Available: May 30, 2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 10, 2006.
Eligible Applicants: State educational agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies (LEAs), and Indian tribes. Additional eligibility requirements are listed elsewhere in this notice under section I. Funding Opportunity Description, Additional Requirements.
Estimated Available Funds: $4,861,300. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2007 from the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $150,000-$350,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $243,065.
Estimated Number of Awards: 20.

Additional Information: Applicable regulations, priorities, and other information are available in the Federal Register notice.

Additional information is available online at:

http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/announcements/2006-2/053006b.html

Sphere: Related Content

Predicting conduct problems

A group of sociologists from the University of Montreal (Quebec, Canada) showed that “kindergarten boys who from low socioeconomic areas are hyperactive, fearless, infrequently prosocial, and raised in adverse family environments” are more likely to report affiliating with deviant peer groups as adolescents than other kindergarten boys who have only one or two of those four risk factors. I wonder whether use of Shep Kellams’ preventative intereventions (see my note on Teach Effectively! yesterday) would divert these boys from the path.

Prediction of early-onset deviant peer group affiliation: a 12-year longitudinal study.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 May;63(5):562-8

Authors: Lacourse E, Nagin DS, Vitaro F, Côté S, Arseneault L, Tremblay RE

CONTEXT: Deviant peer group involvement is strongly related to onset, aggravation, and persistence of conduct problems during adolescence. OBJECTIVE: To identify early childhood behavioral profiles that predict early-onset deviant peer group involvement. DESIGN: A 12-year longitudinal study of behavioral development. SETTING: Fifty-three inner-city elementary schools in a large Canadian city. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1037 boys in kindergarten from low socioeconomic neighborhoods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual self-reported deviant peer group involvement from 11 to 17 years of age. RESULTS: Kindergarten boys were at highest risk of following an early adolescence trajectory of deviant peer group affiliation if they were hyperactive, fearless, and low on prosocial behaviors but much less at risk if they scored high on only 2 of these dimensions. Family adversity had no main effect but substantially increased the risk of following an early adolescence trajectory of deviant peer group affiliation for boys with a profile of hyperactivity, fearlessness, and low prosocial behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Kindergarten boys from low socioeconomic areas who are hyperactive, fearless, infrequently prosocial, and raised in adverse family environments are at much heightened risk of engaging in deviant peer groups early in their development. Boys at high risk can be identified as early as kindergarten and should be targeted for preventive intervention.

PMID: 16651513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Sphere: Related Content




Bad Behavior has blocked 327 access attempts in the last 7 days.