I rarely point to posts on the Huffington Posts, but an entry by Liane Kupferberg Carter entitled “Autism: A time for civility” deserves recognition. Ms. Carter, the mother of a child with Autism, notes how factionation (if I may create than word) among people with interests in Autism has created divides not needed. The basic notion is that in contemporary diagnoses, Autism reflects a diverse spectrum of disorders. Educators, parents, policy-makers, and others need to accept the diversity and not fight among ourselves. Ms. Carter makes this point well. I encourage readers to read her post.
Sphere: Related ContentWhat’s Here?
EBD Blog provides news and commentary about Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in children and youths. These problems have sometimes been called "emotional disturbance" or even "serious emotional disturbance." Whatever they are called, these problems are real, painful, and important. They often affect other people as well as having deleterious effects on school, social relations, and other aspects of the individuals' lives.
EBD Blog Comments
- aesalter on Jaylen is ticked at bullies
- aesalter on Cog mod for PTSD
- aesalter on Gaining perspective
- aesalter on First Step supported by WWC
Blogroll
- 29 Marbles
- A Photon in the Darkness
- ADHD Guide
- Autism Hub
- Autism Vox
- Autism-blog.net
- Behavior Mod
- BiLingual Special Ed blog
- Duncan-Hively
- Facing Autism
- Kids in Pain
- LD Blog
- Letters from Lisa
- Liquid Waffle Girl
- Mad Tedious
- Mentor Matters
- Mr. Chuck Chuck
- Neurodiversity
- On Special Ed
- Ray Nelson's Autism Blog
- Special Ed Law Blog (Fox)
- Special Education Law Blog (Gerl)
- SpedPro
- SPNAC
- Teach Effectively!
- Teachers at Risk
- The Life That Chose Me
- The Voyage
- Welcome to Organized Chaos
- Whitterer on Autism
Web resources
- 1 in 5 kids
- AACAP
- ABA
- APBA
- ASAT
- Autism Consortium
- Autism Speaks
- Autism Watch
- BACB
- Behavior Concepts
- CCBD
- Cochrane Collaboration
- FFCMH
- JBRF
- M.I.N.D. Institute
- MDRI
- MHA
- NAC
- NAMI
- NARSAD
- o 4 r l
- OSLC
- PACER
- PBISAz
- PsychoED Net
- Riggory Ridge Group
- RTC @ PDX
- SAMHSA Kids
- Schafer Autism Report
- STAART
- The Balanced Mind
- Thinking Person's Guide to Autism
- VaCCMH
- VIA School
- Wrong Planet
Academic Blogs
Search
EBD Blog Posts
EBD Blog Categories
Tags
academics
ADHD
adults
advocacy
Autism
Behavior management
behavior problems
bologna
Causes
ccbd
chelation
community
current issues
Delinquency
effective treatment
evidence
evidence-based practice
facilitated communication
Families
genetics
History
insurance
intervention
law
medication
Mental health
mental illness
neurology
neuropsych
News
Parents
Policy
Prevention
public health
public policy
Research
restraint
Schizophrenia
science
seclusion
The press
therapy
Treatment
vaccines
youth

She does talk sense.
However, there is still, erm, a glaring lack here…
Liz, thanks for the comment and the analysis. I’m wondering if Ms. Carter should be charged with duplicity because others didn’t remove posts?
I’m probably not as well-informed about the battles between groups as I should be (sorry). Is AoA a bad batch? A good bunch? Who are they who accuse so-and-so of embracing the wrong view?
I hope we can stick to the arguments. Which argument (not which position by someone whom we see as villain or savior) accords with evidence and reason.
JohnL. Liane did not write the quotes provided by Liz Ditz. They came from http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2010/04/a-clarification/ a British organization.
What posts was she supposed to remove?
Marc, you’re right about the source for the extract that Liz posted. The group-authored post from LBRB was commenting on the criticisms leveled by AoA at others, and the LBRB post noted that none of the posts presenting those arguments have be removed from the AoA site.
I think that Ms. Carter’s call for civility has merit, even if it includes behaving civilly toward people who have said things the someone else considers foolish, inaccurate, or even hurtful. Sorry if my earlier comment did not communicate this clearly.
JohnL, Thanks for the response. I agree with you about the need for civility even if you disagree with the other person. Something our public officials need to learn and practice as well (a bi-partisan statement).
Marc, you nailed it when you mentioned public officials. I don’t know whether the ‘dialog’ (yes, I’m hedging with those quotes) is as disrespectful in other countries or news areas as it is in the US, but I hope it’s not. Can’t we just listen and talk?