Archive for the 'ADHD' Category

Page 4 of 4

ADHD letter from Lisa

Over her blog, Letters from Lisa, Lisa Fischler’s got a very thoughtful statement about Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). She titled it “Does ADHD Exist?” and, as you might suppose, it starts with a string of the indictments that are routinely thrown at ADHD. But within two paragraphs, she’s begun to dismember and eviserate those arguments. After many insightful comments and a host of thoughtful analyses, she concludes with this paragraph:

Point being, it’s not simple, and I really dislike when people pretend it is. I think it’s disrespectful to trivialize the issues that people face when they have attention problems by saying that those problems don’t really exist, or that it’s all the fault of one thing or another. It’s so impressive what these kids (and adults too) are able to accomplish and handle, but heartbreaking when you see the misunderstanding and suffering that can come with it. Hopefully the kids I’ve worked with will grow up to have their own understanding of what ADHD means to them, and gain a sense of mastery over their own environment and destiny.

Follow this link to Does ADHD exist? on Letters from Lisa (where one can also find other sensible posts). It’s worth the read, both because it’s a sentient analysis of pop-psych babble that usually passes as argument and because it’s just dang well written.

Sphere: Related Content

Turtel overboard

Joel Turtel, a self-identified libertarian who advocates for home- and private-schooling and against public schools and taxes and who appears in many right wing venues, has an article challenging the diagnosis of Attention Deficit-Hypactivity Disorder (ADHD). Quoting from two selected experts, Mr. Turtel argues that ADHD symptoms are consequences of boredom and nearly three dozen other conditions (including Learning Disabilities, sleep disorders, iron deficiency, etc.). He reports that public school personnel recommend medications to parents, a practice that would be unprofessional, let alone illegitimate! Here is his recommendation to parents:

Parents, do not fall for the ADHD arguments that some public school authorities are now attempting to foist on you and your children. Although a few children do exhibit extreme “symptoms” of ADHD, for most normal kids ADHD turns out to be a questionable “disease” at best, and a bogus disease at worst. Many public schools now use this alleged ADHD disease as a convenient excuse to pressure parents to give their normal but bored or high-energy children mind-altering drugs.

Parents, do not succumb to the temptation to drug your children with mind-altering drugs because a public-school teacher or school nurse tells you that your child is not “behaving properly” or “paying attention” in class. There are many other ways to deal with children’s “behavior” problems in school besides drugging your children. One of the best ways is to take your children out of public school so they aren’t bored to death sitting in public school classrooms. When children get engrossed in learning in a stimulating homeschool environment, they are far less likely to misbehave.

I happen to agree that schools could be organized and conducted in ways that would reduce many of the problems associated with ADHD. Providing highly engaging, fast-paced lessons which require students to respond frequently and make nuanced changes in their answers based on corresponding changes in the questions teachers ask would surely result in lower levels of attention problems than one would observe in the typical child-centered classroom. (See, for example, the study by D. Carnine of the effects of differing frequencies of teacher questioning on students attention behavior from JABA, 1976). However, I doubt that such environments will eliminate all variance in attention; some children will still have difficulty with attending, inhibiting impulses, changing activities frequently, and so forth. So I can’t altogether buy Mr. Turtel’s faulting of the schools.

I am not advocating prescription of medications. Far from it, I suspect that they are over prescribed. But, I know the literature on them shows clear benefits for many children.

Moreover, I have other problems with Mr. Turtel’s argument. Beyond using only selected authorities, he has ignored a substantial body of knowledge. It would be very interesting to know, for example, how Mr. Turtel would respond to a few of the quite-strong neuropsych studies of ADHD.

Mr. Turtel apparently deposited his article in one or more free content sites, as it has been published on scores of sites. Here’s a link to just one of them. Thanks to Liz Ditz for bringing this to my attention.

Sphere: Related Content

Cylert dropped by FDA

The U.S. Food and Drug Agency (FDA) has recommended that health-care professionals who prescribe one of the widely used drugs for treating Attention Deficit Disorder should switch patients to other comparable drugs. The FDA cited potential for liver damage in its alert about the drug, Cylert, and generic versions of it (pemoline). Cylert, will continue to be available through pharmacies and wholesalers until supplies are exhausted

The Agency has concluded that the overall risk of liver toxicity from Cylert and generic pemoline products outweighs the benefits of this drug. In May 2005, Abbott chose to stop sales and marketing of Cylert in the U.S. All generic companies have also agreed to stop sales and marketing of this product (Pemoline tablets and chewable tablets). Cylert is a central nervous system stimulant indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This product is considered second line therapy for ADHD because of its association with life threatening hepatic failure

Link to the FDA statement.

Sphere: Related Content

IDEA requires what?

Here’s a snippet from a story in the Navasota Examiner & Grimes County Review (TX, US). Under the headline, “Area agencies receive over $8 million in grants,” these are the first two paragraphs (the remainder is a list of other funded activities):

Navasota ISD and Brazos, Montgomery and Waller counties will be receiveing funds from the state following Gov. Rick Perry’s announcement of the release of more than $8 million to Texas counties for more crime-fighting, drug treatment courts and juvenile justice programs.

Awarded under the State Criminal Justice Planning Fund and distributed by the Governor’s Criminal Justice Division was $37,125 to Navasota ISD for a special teacher and teacher’s aide to assist students with emotional disturbance, ADHD or other special needs with education planning as well as provide life-skills training classes, counseling services and tutoring services.

It’s great that there will be another teacher and an aide, but does anyone wonder why those positions didn’t already exist? I do. I was under the impression that if there were students identified as needing special education, the local education agency was required to provide the needed services? This story leaves me with the impression that the funding of services is based on grants from the state education association. There must be more to it….

Link to the story.

Sphere: Related Content

CDC on ADHD

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has released a report on the “Prevalence of Diagnosed and Medicated Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: United States, 2003″ that is well worth review. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most rapidly growing behavior problems in the US. Children with ADHD who need special education services are most often identified under the category “Other Health Impaired”; US definitions of disability under IDEA Part B regulations include “attention deficit disorder” (ADD) and “attention deficit hyperactivity disorder” (ADHD) among the conditions that make a child eligible for services under the “other health impairment” (OHI) category.

Although there is the potential for bias in the data (parents’ reports in telephone surveys may not be accurate), the methods are very good and the results are quite informative. Here’s one item that stuck out for me. The figure shows by state the percentage of children who have, sometime during their lives, been diagnosed with ADHD (longer light-colored bars) and those who are currently taking medication for ADHD. (The small image at the right is linked to the full-sized figure in the CDC report.)

Why does the percentage vary so much? This is the same question that people have asked about other categories of disability (e.g., Learning Disabilities). The report offers a note about this question: “Certain state variation in ADHD diagnosis might be attributed to underlying state differences in diagnostic practice, sociodemographic characteristics, or both.” When I get a chance, I’ll run a couple of correlations.

To be sure, the data in a survey such as this can not be taken as showing what one might call the true prevalence of a condition, whether it is ADHD, Autism, diabetes, blondness, or just about anything else. Not only might reporters (parents in this case) give mistaken information for any of many different reasons (faulty memories, perceptions of what the interviewer hopes to hear, and so forth), but also the reporter might accurately report false information provided to her or him in the past (a person selling herbs might have suggested some remedy for ADHD or, after a brief, one-time encounter with the child, a dentist might have made a comment about ADHD). So, readers of the CDC report should take it for what it is: Just a report of a telephone survey showing what parents report.

Link to the Web site on ADHD of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities.

Sphere: Related Content




Bad Behavior has blocked 329 access attempts in the last 7 days.